France 2017-2020

France has one of those charts. One that jumps out immediately- no wonder it has had so many Republics, and been a key battleground in 2 world wards, there is something inherently unstable about it despite its motto of liberte egalite fraternite and its artistic and philosophical slant. No surprises then, that it has suffered more than its fair share of terrorism in the last few years, and one can’t get away from the idea that the other type of battles of European Union and the Euro won’t ultimately be fought in Greece or the Uk but in France.  And it seems that we will see some of those issues be addressed in the coming 5+ years.
2017
However January and February 2017 are not really those times. There may be lots going on in preparation for the presidential election of 2017, and there is continued impetus for change but there is no indication of outright conflict at this time.
Things are, unsurprisingly given the April election) a little more tricky come March to May. It will certainly be a hard fought period when the outside world will see France as being a risky bet, though internally it will be much more politics as usual. Obviously there is change – this analysis doesn’t tell us more than how that will play out after the election.
June To August sees things settle down and the element of conflict  reduce, though not eliminated.  However there are new factors at play as a shake- up starts in economic issues, unfortunately it could lead to  strategy which is idealistic but mistaken.
September and October see this continue and unfortunately it may be accompanied by some partial breakdown in relationships with other countries ( this might or might not be Euro related). There is a dangerous attempt to assert independent ideals at this time.
November and December see the above themes emphasised even more. There is huge expectation that change will be for the better and deeply passionate commitment to that but there is also support for the status quo. The result is a short period of policy debate but little long term result.
 
2018
 
2018 is a year which is even more about conflict, or at the very least, attacks on the foundation of French principles.
January and February start with the same issues as 2017 ended.
But there is much more potential for open conflict now. While I don’t see a long term trend emerging yet, this is definitely a time for care to be taken in the country.
March and April see country and leadership aligned, which I’d like to think was in response to good policies, but I am afraid that that won’t be the case. There is still a lot of very difficult pressure that requires calming down.
May to September sees a shift in focus. The people are energised, although they are not sure how to use this new drive. There is a short period where the president or government may be held is a very positive light. But the greatest theme is that of the beginnings of change to the way the country trades and does business; changes that represent the end of a long cycle and may have a radical effect on the economic system for the longer term. France is likely to  be a focal point at this time.
October to December, see the continuation of this theme (as it will take some time to develop and then embed).The people as a whole are highly motivated by the changes .
However there is still a risk of objections taking a more militant tone during the early part of this period at least.
2019
January and February 2019 are months when the watchword is “adjustment”. There is far less direct action than in late 2018. Things are more tricky and take longer than expected.
Getting everyone on the same page is harder than the idealists might think and, some restriction and regulation is needed to help bring things about. Nevertheless some change can move forward.
March and April sees a more difficult period, when the leadership and the people are not so much in agreement, the idealism is ok in theory but the changes to the status quo economically are very unsettling. There may be a tendency to cling to the past from some quarters.
By early May the people are keen to be seen to be in charge ( this is after all a republic) . The is a slower pace to change and more restriction to keep things in order.
The rather difficult sentiment of spring/summer 2018 is better channelled now into debate rather than anything more physical.
However it won’t be an uneventful time.
August to October is quieter. There is time to consider the statistics and what they mean, as well as to align a vision.
Change continues but is probably confined to institutions and policies rather than the outside world now.
November and December see more of the same. Generally the country is more at ease during this phase.
Some restrictions are possible again, but there is general momentum and definite optimism to push forward. A good time economically.
2020
 
January 2020 is relatively quiet, despite the mood of freedom that pervades. I would guess that focus is elsewhere now.
February and March are more challenging. There is a situation with other country(ies) which is at odds with the direction France is moving leading to a bit of a stalemate. However there is also a sense of dynamism and positive development which suggests that internally progress can be made.
April to June sees the international situation escalate somewhat. Hope of diplomatic solutions is not realised. And the ongoing internal institutional changes are more noticeable again, and this time there are all sorts of obstacles to progress.
July to October is a mixed period. At the beginning no one particular theme stands out; more of what has gone before, but perhaps in a more moderated way.
By the end of the period the external issues are key again and there must be a huge amount of effort employed to negotiate a sensible outcome.
Then in November and December we see globally another change of focus. In France this initially means a quieter time as changes go on as intended, and the impact on the perception of the leadership appears good. But by the end of December everything has shifted and the flaws in the economic reforms might emerge.  

Comments